MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382566946 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8

Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky

2023· book· en· W4382566946 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in computer and information science · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversidade Federal de AlagoasDipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di CataniaSorbonne UniversitéSingapore Management UniversityUniversity of TsukubaTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyCalifornia State University, FullertonUniversità di BolognaUniversidad de ChileUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidad Politécnica de MadridUniversity of SydneyUniversity of PennsylvaniaÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneUniversité de LyonGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverBeijing Normal UniversityUniversità degli Studi di CagliariKindai UniversityUniversity of South AustraliaMcGill UniversityUniversity of PittsburghAthabasca UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversity of Central FloridaGeorgia Institute of TechnologyEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaKanazawa UniversityGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of Colorado BoulderUniversiteit UtrechtEducational Testing Service
KeywordsSkyLibrary scienceComputer scienceEngineeringGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in computer and information scienceSame topicArtificial Intelligence in EducationFrench-language works237,207