MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382568265 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3290644

Optimizing Age of Information in Polar-Coded Status Update System

2023· article· en· W4382568265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHybrid automatic repeat requestComputer sciencePuncturingPolar codeDecoding methodsReal-time computingTransmission (telecommunications)Redundancy (engineering)Tree traversalAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Age of information (AoI) defines the freshness of status update in real-time systems, such as the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and can be affected by delays and transmission error probability. To improve the reliability of data transmissions, the recent AoI works on physical layer considered applying practical coding schemes. Since polar codes can be strictly proved to achieve the channel capacity, this article makes an effort to comprehensively investigate and optimize the AoI performance in a polar-coded status update system. First, we propose a practical code-based status update system that takes full consideration of encoding, transmission, propagation, decoding, and feedback delays in AoI analysis. Then, we analyze and derive the average AoI of the proposed system with various transmission protocols. The simulation results of a polar-coded system validate the theoretical analysis and show that hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) achieves better AoI performance than non-HARQ. To optimize AoI in polar-coded status update system, we further improve the designs for HARQ with chase combining (HARQ-CC) and HARQ with incremental redundancy (HARQ-IR), respectively. The design signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), puncturing length of HARQ-CC are optimized by traversal, while the code lengths for each transmission and maximum transmission times of HARQ-IR are optimized by the greedy algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed HARQ can achieve better average AoI performance than traditional HARQ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it