In Situ Constructed 3D Lithium Anodes for Long‐Cycling All‐Solid‐State Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Constructing a 3D lithium metal anode has been demonstrated to be the most effective strategy to address its dendrite issue in liquid batteries. However, this promising approach has proved challenging to inherit in all‐solid‐state Li metal batteries (ASSLMBs) because of the rigidity of inorganic solid electrolytes (SEs), which constrains interfacial solid–solid ionic contact. Herein, a 3D Li anode is in situ constructed for ASSLMBs by spontaneous chemical reactions between halide SEs and Li metal. The in situ formed Li–Al alloys and well‐maintained sulfide SEs inside the 3D structure serve as continuous electron and Li + transport pathways and facilitate the homogenous distribution of charge carriers. The lithiophilic Li alloy can regulate Li deposition behavior and enable uniform Li nucleation and deposition. Both the Li||Li symmetric and full batteries exhibit good electrochemical performance at high current density. This work provides a universal strategy and new insight perspective to construct 3D Li for high‐performance ASSLMBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".