MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382653138 · doi:10.1002/9781119873747.ch8

DRL at the Application and Service Layer

2023· other· en· W4382653138 on OpenAlexaff
Dinh Thai Hoang, Nguyễn Văn Huynh, Diep N. Nguyen, Ekram Hossain, Dusit Niyato

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputation offloadingInternet of ThingsEdge computingDistributed computingComputer networkLayer (electronics)Service (business)ServerApplication layerEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFocus (optics)ComputationTask (project management)AnalyticsEmbedded systemOperating systemTelecommunicationsEngineeringDatabaseSoftware deployment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) has become a promising solution for autonomous and cooperative driving applications that require intensive computations or applications such as video caching, which require huge storage capacity. Again, Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as smart homes, autonomous driving, and cooperative driving are expected to be the cornerstone of intelligent transportation systems and smart cities. MEC has become a promising solution to address such applications' massive computation and caching demands. However, there are still many challenges, such as the efficient design of MEC frameworks, MEC server placement, and optimization of task offloading, caching, and communication strategies. In this chapter, we focus on how DRL can be employed to optimize the following challenges at the application and service layer: (i) content caching, (ii) computation offloading, and (iii) data processing and analytics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207