Derechos humanos de First Nations, Inuit y Metis: una tarea pendiente en la política canadiense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El ensayo revisará la relación entre la “Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas” (UNDRIP) adoptada por la Asamblea General en 2007 y por Canadá en 2010, con la posterior creación de la “Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación”, ambos como instrumentos de diplomacia indígena. Lo anterior, servirá como punto de partida para conocer la situación federal de comunidades indias que han enfrentado por décadas discriminación e imposición de políticas de asimilación a patrones culturales que les son ajenos, lo que conlleva la pérdida de tradiciones sociales y económicas, y en casos extremos algunos fueron víctimas de las llamadas residential schools católicas desde inicios del Siglo XX, establecidas por la Indian Act de 1876.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".