MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382658177 · doi:10.1155/2023/4602148

Ground-Air Traffic Congestion Propagation Model Based on Hierarchical Control Interdependent Network

2023· article· en· W4382658177 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAir traffic controlFree flightNetwork traffic controlTraffic generation modelComputer scienceTraffic congestionComputer networkNetwork topologyNetwork modelNetwork traffic simulationSimulationTopology (electrical circuits)Distributed computingEngineeringTransport engineeringAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multilayer network approach to model and analyze air traffic networks is proposed. These networks are viewed as complex systems with interactions between airports, airspaces, procedures, and air traffic flows (ATFs). A topology-based airport-airspace network and a flight trajectory network are developed to represent critical physical and operational characteristics. A multilayer traffic flow network and an interrelated traffic congestion propagation network are also formulated to represent the ATF connection and congestion propagation dynamics, respectively. Furthermore, a set of analytical metrics, including those of airport surface (AS), terminal controlled airspace (TCA), and area-controlled airspace (ACA), is introduced and applied to a case study in central and south-eastern China. The empirical results show the existence of a fundamental diagram of the airport, terminal, and intersections of air routes. Moreover, the dynamics and underlying mechanisms of congestion propagation through the AS-TCA-ACA network are revealed and interpreted using the classical susceptible-infectious-removed model in a hierarchical network. Finally, a high propagation probability among adjacent terminals and a high recovery probability are identified at the network system level. This study provides analytical tools for comprehending the complex interactions among air traffic systems and identifies future developments and automation of layered coupled air traffic management systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it