MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382679991 · doi:10.29244/agro-maritim.050210

Disharmoni Perencanaan Ruang

2023· article· id· W4382679991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Brief Pertanian Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perencanaan yang ideal dan berkelanjutan masih menjadi harapan seluruh manusia. Tahapan perencanaan ruang di Indonesia sudah diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomer 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang (cq. Undang-undang Cipta Kerja Nomor 11 Tahun 2020). Meskipun telah diatur secara undang-undang namun disharmoni perencanaan ruang masih terjadi di Indonesia sampai saat ini. Berbagai kebijakan dan regulasi dalam penyelenggaran perencanaan ruang telah ditetapkan. Namun demikian, di era disrupsi adaptasi perencanaan dengan pendekatan teknologi informasi perlu dilakukan, guna memperkecil ketidakpastian. Rekomendasi pelengkapan, penambahan, perbaikan standar teknis penyelenggaraan perencanaan ruang telah disajikan dalam naskah ini. Urgensi dari usulan ini adalah terciptanya suatu efisiensi dan efektivitas pembangunan sebagai implementasi dari rencana tata ruang di setiap levelnya dapat terwujud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it