MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development and Application of an MRM Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Sodium Channels Na v 1.1, Na v 1.2 and Na v 1.6 in Stable HEK293 cell lines, and Solubilized Membrane Proteins from Rodents and Human Brain Tissues.

2023· preprint· en· W4382680081 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Sojo, Raibow Kwan, Prerna Das, Nealan G. A. Gerrebos, Jenny Li, Xin Yin Wang, Gina DeBoer, Vanessa Emnacen‐Pankhurst, Sophia Lin, Raymond Feng, Sam Goodchild

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsXenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHEK 293 cellsChemistryTransfectionElectrospray ionizationSodium channelSodiumCell cultureMolecular biologyMembraneChromatographyMass spectrometryBiochemistryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale Na v 1.1, 1.2 and 1.6 are transmembrane proteins acting as voltage gated sodium channels implicated in various forms of epilepsy. There is a need for knowing their actual concentration in target tissues during drug development. Methods Unique peptides for Na v 1.1, Na v 1.2 and Na v 1.6 were selected as quantotropic peptides for each protein and used for their quantification in plasma membranes from stably transfected HEK293 cells and rodent and human brain samples using ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Results Na v 1.1, 1.2 and 1.6 protein expressions in three stably individually transfected HEK293 cell lines were found to be 2.1±0.2, 6.4±1.2 and 4.0±0.6 fmole/µg membrane protein respectively. Na v 1.2 showed the highest expression, with approximately 3 times higher (p<0.003) in rodents than in human at 3.05±0.57, 3.35±0.56 in mouse and rat brains and 1.09±0.27 fmole/µg in human, respectively. Both Na v 1.1 and 1.6 expressions were much lower than Na v 1.2, with approximately 40% less expression in human Na v 1.1 when compared with rodents Na v 1.1 at 0.49±0.1 (mouse), 0.43±0.3 (rat), and 0.28±0.04 (human); while Na v 1.6 was approximately 60% less expression in human when compared to rodents at 0.27±0.09 (mouse), 0.26±0.06 (rat) and 0.11±0.02 (human) fmole/µg membrane proteins. Conclusions MRM was used to quantify sodium channels Na v 1.1, 1.2 and 1.6 expressed in stably transfected HEK293 cells and brain tissues from mouse, rat, and human. We found significant differences in the expression of these channels in mouse, rat, and human brains. Na v expression ranking among the three species was Na v 1.2 >> Na v 1.1> Na v 1.6, with the human brain expressing much lower concentrations overall in comparison to rodents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→