MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382680910 · doi:10.11159/iccste23.206

Development of Digital Twin Concept for Real-Time Detection of Abnormal Changes in Structural Behaviour

2023· article· en· W4382680910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shady Adib, Vladimir Vinogradov, Peter Gosling

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrussArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFinite element methodStiffnessDamagesArtificial intelligenceReduction (mathematics)Identification (biology)Stage (stratigraphy)Data miningStructural engineeringMachine learningEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims to extend the definition of Digital Twin (DT) concept to be able to identify small severity damages by incorporating mathematical formulations in construction of neural networks.Advanced modelling techniques such as Reduced Basis (RB) method and artificial neural networks were used during the offline stage to develop a DT model to detect abnormal changes in structural behaviour during the online monitoring stage.Finite element model was used with RB model order reduction technique for construction of a low-dimensional space to speed the analysis during the online stage.Different damage scenarios were implemented by reducing the effective stiffness of several structural members to test the ability of the established DT model to detect damages once they have appeared in the structure.In addition, the RB model was used to choose the optimal location of displacement sensors in a physical structure.The RB model was validated against experimental test results for a two-dimensional truss.A neural network was developed and trained to identify the location of damage once it has appeared during the operational stage.The constructed RB model was used again for identification of severity of damage identified by the optimized neural network.It was found that the developed method showed high accuracy in identifying small severity damages during the online stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207