MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382680988 · doi:10.11159/iccste23.110

Bayesian Belief Network and Optimal Learning Analysis of Historical Flood Level Data for the Mississippi Watershed Under Data Paucity Conditions

2023· article· en· W4382680988 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicholas V. Scott, Dietrick Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedFlood mythBayesian networkComputer scienceBayesian probabilityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData scienceHydrology (agriculture)Data miningEnvironmental scienceGeographyGeologyArchaeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Floods along the Mississippi watershed cause large amounts of property damage and inflict great costs to human life [1].With drastic changes in climate, characterization of flood events has taken on great importance to hydrologists, civil engineers, and water resource scientists tasked with understanding its dynamics, characterizing its spatial statistical structure, and indirectly safeguarding human life.Bayesian belief networks and optimal learning analysis are applied to sparse flood height data captured at specific local sites providing spatio-temporal statistical insight into flooding event structure occurring in the Mississippi watershed over large time scales.The objectives of this preliminary analysis are twofold addressing how to gain statistical process insight given data paucity.The first objective is to gain understanding of the spatial correlation of riverine site flooding data for the purpose of establishing Bayesian priors for future Bayesian hierarchical modelling of flood event structure.The second objective is to provide guidance to leadership as where to sample in space and time over the array in the future given a preconceived notion of mean and maximum spatial flood event structure.Time series of flood heights from twenty sites distributed over the Mississippi watershed stretching from Minnesota to the Louisiana delta region at the Gulf of Mexico, obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) database, consisted of 1967 temporal points for each riverine site spanning the years of 1785 to 2021.Approximately 10 % of the points in each time series were nonzero where sampling of flood height levels was irregularly sampled in time but cotemporally across space.This extreme case of data paucity suggested treatment of flood height as an extreme value variable.The Chow-Liu algorithm-based Bayesian belief network (BBN) for the flood height array spanning the complete data time span demonstrates a complex tree structure comprised of riverine site links with overall weak mutual information values [2,3].Five riverine links possessed mutual information strengths greater than 0.01 representing predominantly local spatial connections in the middle portion of the array.State levels associated with marginal probability distributions for the BBN nodes experience extreme state modulations which are strongly locally bounded when evidence is provided at the five nodes.These characteristics are all due to data paucity.The BBN provides limited understanding of global propagation of evidence but does provide spatial Bayesian prior state understanding for future Bayesian hierarchical modelling as more data is accrued in the future.With the strong need for more data to perform robust Bayesian modelling of the flood height level monitoring system, optimal learning simulations were performed on the twenty-site array.Optimal learning is used to gain insight into where data samples should be captured in space and time given a preconceived understanding of appropriate mean flood height levels [4].Four simulation studies were performed where four different multivariate objective functions and prior belief combinations were used.The aim was to estimate the optimal site sample choices at a series of time steps for goal state function attainment.The knowledge gradient, the principle which guides the Bayesian myopic choice at each time step where correlated beliefs between the twenty-site multivariate array are modulated, is used in the optimization process [5].Initial results demonstrate that convergence to the different multivariate objective functions from different prior states, measured by the root mean square value, occurs on the order of two hundred steps for all simulations.On the other hand, different levels of convergence exist with the largest root mean square values or errors existing for the simulations modeling the approach towards an extreme value objective function from an extreme value-based prior.All results are 110-2 consistent with data paucity conditions suggesting that robust estimates of reasonable objective functions require abundant measurements at specific measurement sites designated by the knowledge gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207