MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382682164 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100318

Development of a Hybrid System Model for Enhanced Lifespan, Energy Efficiency, and Power Quality in Fuel Cells

2023· article· en· W4382682164 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bambang Bagus Harianto, Ghaidaa Raheem Lateef Al‐Awsi, R. Sivaraman, Mukhiddin Anarboev, Vadim V. Ponkratov, Serge Lawrencenko, A. Surendar, Tatiana Bloshenko, Iskandar Muda

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuel cellsPower (physics)Quality (philosophy)Energy (signal processing)Efficient energy useEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel cells serve as environmentally friendly alternatives to fossil fuels by providing clean energy.Integrating a fuel cell with an energy storage system, such as a battery, results in cost savings and performance improvements.The battery functions as an energy storage source, enabling the regulation and maintenance of fuel cell power at acceptable levels.Introducing an innovative and optimal power management method for hybrid electric energy supply systems can significantly contribute to the advancement of renewable resources by reducing costs, enhancing energy efficiency, increasing system reliability, and improving fuel cell lifespan.In this study, a membrane exchange fuel cell model, combined with a battery, is presented using MATLAB.The results demonstrate an increase in fuel cell life, energy efficiency, and output power quality.The state of charge (SOC) of the battery fluctuates between 52% and 34%, while the output power of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) ranges between 30 and 20 watts.It is worth noting that, during the 1,200-second power supply process using the proposed strategy, only six PEMFC working points have changed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207