MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382699014 · doi:10.9734/bpi/namms/v7/9233f

Comparison of Two Knee Prolotherapy Injection Methods in Reducing Pain and Improving the Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382699014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zahra Rezasoltani, Mehrdad Taheri, Morteza Kazempour Mofrad, Seyed Amir Mohajerani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProlotherapyOsteoarthritisWOMACVisual analogue scaleKnee painLidocaineMorning stiffnessKnee JointSurgeryPhysical therapyRheumatoid arthritisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present chapter sought to compare the effect of periarticular versus intraarticular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee Osteoarthritis (OA). To compare the effect of periarticular versus intra-articular prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with knee OA. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that manifests mainly with painful joints, articular stiffness, and decreased function. t is often described as a chronic degenerative disease and thought by many to be an inevitable consequence of growing old. This randomized souble blind controlled clinical trial was carried out at Single-center, university hospital (Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran). A total of 104 patients with chronic knee OA were enrolled. In the intra-articular group, 8 mL of 10% dextrose and 2 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Injections were repeated at 1 and 2 weeks after the first injection. In the periarticular group, 5 mL of 20% dextrose and 5 mL of 1% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously at 4 points in the periarticular area. Pain and disability, as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were recorded at each follow-up visit at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months post-injection. The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the periarticular compared with the intra-articular group at the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-month visits but not at 1 month. Morning stiffness and difficulty in rising from sitting were improved in both groups and were not significantly different in the periand intra-articular groups.Both groups showed improvements in their scores for pain, joint locking, and limitation. Pain in both sitting and standing positions, difficulty climbing stairs or walking on flat surfaces, and these symptoms all improved in both groups from 1 to 5 months after treatment. Periarticular injections around the knee joint ignite the inflammatory reaction in the vicinity of joint capsule. The infiltration of inflammatory cells and cytokines to the periarticular area may enhance blood perfusion in the capsular joint, increase nourishment to the cartilaginous tissue, and enhance regeneration. Periarticular prolotherapy has comparable effects on pain and disability due to knee OA to intra-articular injections while avoiding risks of complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207