MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382724265 · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100620

Biweekly vs Triweekly low dose intravenous ketamine acute series for severe major depression: A case report

2023· article· en· W4382724265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityDepression (economics)RegimenMedicineKetamineMajor depressive episodeMajor depressive disorderAntidepressantInternal medicineAnesthesiaPsychiatryAdverse effectMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Biweekly or triweekly IV ketamine treatment regimens were effective for managing TRD. • The patient responded to triweekly IV ketamine treatment faster than biweekly. • Both biweekly and triweekly IV ketamine treatment were well tolerated. • Re-trialing IV ketamine was effective at managing recurrent depression symptoms. One third of the patients with Major Depression Disorder (MDD) fail to respond to conventional antidepressant treatments - treatment resistant depression (TRD). Low-dose IV ketamine (LDIVK) treatment has become a promising solution for these patients. However, infusion regimens for LDIVK acute series have not been standardized yet. Also, evidence is scarce for retrialing LDIVK treatment to manage MDD symptom recurrences. This is a case study of a 45-year-old female experiencing MDD TRD, who completed a triweekly and a biweekly acute course (4 week) of LDIVK treatment three years apart. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by comparing baseline to weekly depression severity scores using validated psychiatric scales to determine changes in depression symptoms. Tolerability was assessed by systematically registering side effects through the infusions. In both acute series, the patient achieved symptomatic response equivalent to remission. On the triweekly acute course the patient achieved symptom remission by the second week and in the biweekly acute course by the third week. Reported side effects were mild and transient. Results of only one patient included in this report and a different number of LDIVK infusions in each acute course, with the triweekly vs biweekly course providing four additional infusions in four weeks. These results suggest that implementing a triweekly regimen may be well-tolerated and result in a faster treatment response in certain patients, compared to a biweekly regimen. Furthermore, this case also supports the possibility of a ketamine retrial in case of major depressive recurrences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it