Risk assessment for postoperative venous thromboembolism using the modified Caprini risk assessment model in lung cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-documented cause of morbidity and mortality in lung cancer patients. However, risk identification remains limited. In this study, we sought to analyze the risk factors for VTE and verify the predictive value of the modified Caprini risk assessment model (RAM). Methods: This prospective single-center study included patients with resectable lung cancer who underwent resection between October 2019 and March 2021. The incidence of VTE was estimated. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for VTE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to test the ability of the modified Caprini RAM to predict VTE. Results: The VTE incidence was 10.5%. Several variables, including age, D-dimer, hemoglobin (Hb), bleeding, and patient confinement to bed were significantly associated with VTE after surgery. The difference between the VTE and non-VTE groups in the high-risk levels was statistically significant (P<0.001), while the low and moderate risk levels showed no significant difference. The combined use of the modified Caprini score and the Hb and D-dimer levels showed an area under the curve (AUC) was 0.822 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.760-0.855. P<0.001]. Conclusions: The risk-stratification approach of the modified Caprini RAM is not particularly valid after lung resection in our population. The use of the modified Caprini RAM combined with Hb and D-dimer levels shows a good diagnostic performance for VTE prediction in patients with lung cancer undergoing resection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".