MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382774839 · doi:10.9744/petraijbs.6.1.53-61

The effect of COVID-19, Non-performing Loans, and Non-Interest Income on Bank Performance

2023· article· en· W4382774839 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christina Indah, Rofikoh Rokhim

Bibliographic record

VenuePetra International Journal of Business Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Net interest incomeCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicSample (material)Panel dataInterest rateBusinessNet interest marginEconomicsFinancial systemFinanceReturn on assetsGeographyEconometricsProfitability index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic that has hit the entire world has also had a major impact on the banking industry at the global level. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of the COVID- 19 pandemic, non-performing loans, and non-interest income in ASEAN-5 countries from the first quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2021. The sample consists of 86 banks listed in the capital markets of Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, and Philippines. The research method used is panel regression estimated using fixed effect model and random effect model. The results showed that COVID-19 had a significant positive effect on net income after taxes, while non-performing loans also had a significant and negative effect on banking performance. However, there is no significant role in non-interest income in banking in ASEAN-5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetra International Journal of Business StudiesSame topicCorporate Governance and Financial ManagementFrench-language works237,207