A qualitative exploration of parental caregivers’ experience caring for children who have survived medulloblastoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 70% of children diagnosed with a medulloblastoma will become long-term survivors. Medulloblastoma therapy frequently causes long-term morbidities in survivors, which places a considerable burden on parental caregivers. We aimed to explore the experience of parental caregivers caring for medulloblastoma survivors. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using grounded theory thematic analysis. We used semi-structured parental caregiver interviews to explore family experiences, social circumstances, and family-reported impact within families of children who had survived medulloblastoma. Parental caregivers were recruited from specialized survivor clinics at two large quaternary centers in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: Sixteen of 22 eligible families participated, and 20 parental caregiver interviews were completed. Survivors were a median age of 6 years (range: 1-9 years) at diagnosis, and were 9.5 years (range: 5-12 years) from treatment at the time of the interview. Three major themes and associated subthemes emerged: (i) parental caregivers described significant long-term challenges associated with their child's survivorship. Subthemes included medical treatment sequelae, school issues and behavioral concerns, and surveillance and access to care. (ii) Parental caregivers recognized the impact that their child's quality of life (QOL) had on both their personal and family QOL. Subthemes included parental QOL, parental mental health and coping, spousal relationships, and effects on the family unit as a whole. (iii) Parental caregivers reported experiencing conflicting emotions related to their child's survivorship status and long-term effects. Subthemes included feeling happiness with concurrent worry, fear, and stress, as well as concerns about the future. CONCLUSIONS: Parental caregivers of medulloblastoma survivors experience long-term challenges, with personal and family impacts. Further work is needed to improve care models and support systems for families with a child who has survived medulloblastoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".