Neuroimaging feature extraction using a neural network classifier for imaging genetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dealing with the high dimension of both neuroimaging data and genetic data is a difficult problem in the association of genetic data to neuroimaging. In this article, we tackle the latter problem with an eye toward developing solutions that are relevant for disease prediction. Supported by a vast literature on the predictive power of neural networks, our proposed solution uses neural networks to extract from neuroimaging data features that are relevant for predicting Alzheimer's Disease (AD) for subsequent relation to genetics. The neuroimaging-genetic pipeline we propose is comprised of image processing, neuroimaging feature extraction and genetic association steps. We present a neural network classifier for extracting neuroimaging features that are related with the disease. The proposed method is data-driven and requires no expert advice or a priori selection of regions of interest. We further propose a multivariate regression with priors specified in the Bayesian framework that allows for group sparsity at multiple levels including SNPs and genes. RESULTS: We find the features extracted with our proposed method are better predictors of AD than features used previously in the literature suggesting that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to the features extracted by our proposed method are also more relevant for AD. Our neuroimaging-genetic pipeline lead to the identification of some overlapping and more importantly some different SNPs when compared to those identified with previously used features. CONCLUSIONS: The pipeline we propose combines machine learning and statistical methods to benefit from the strong predictive performance of blackbox models to extract relevant features while preserving the interpretation provided by Bayesian models for genetic association. Finally, we argue in favour of using automatic feature extraction, such as the method we propose, in addition to ROI or voxelwise analysis to find potentially novel disease-relevant SNPs that may not be detected when using ROIs or voxels alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".