The history of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the second half of the 16th – first third of the 17th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В исследовании ставится цель обобщить, систематизировать сведения и исследовать развитие иконописи в Костромском крае во второй половине XVI – первой трети XVII века. Вводятся в научный оборот и изучаются данные из немногочисленных дошедших до наших дней источников. В 1982 году Государственный архив Костромской области пострадал от пожара, что привело к утрате многих документов XVI–XVII веков. В основу исследования положены утраченные документы и материалы архива в частичном упоминании В.Г. Брюсовой; Писцовая книга Костромы 1627/28–1629/1630 гг., которая является важным источником по социально-экономическому положению города в первой трети XVII века; сведения из различных дореволюционных изданий, новейшего свода русской иконописи XIII–XIX вв. и других источников. Систематизация приведенных фактов дает представление о формировании и развитии иконописи в Костромском крае в указанный период. Начало становления иконописи в Костроме предварительно отнесено к последней четверти XVI века, в первой трети XVII века работы местных иконописцев уже распространяются по России и Костромскому краю и имеют характерные черты письма. This study aims to generalize, systematize and study the development of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the second half of the 16th – the first third of the 17th century. The author introduces into scientific circulation and systematizes information from a few sources that have come down to our days. In 1982, the State Archive of the Kostroma Region suffered from a fire, so many documents of the 16th–17th centuries were lost. The study is based on lost documents and archive materials in partial mention by V.G. Bryusova; the Scribe Book of Kostroma 1627/28–1629/1630, which is an important source on the social and economic situation of the city in the first third of the 17th century; information from various pre-revolutionary publications, the present corpus of Russian icon painting of the 13th–19th and other sources. The systematization of the given data gives an idea of the formation and development of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the specified period. The beginning of the formation of icon painting in Kostroma dates back to the last quarter of the 16th century. In the first third of the 17th century, the works of Kostroma icon painters were already spreading throughout Russia and the Kostroma Region and were distinguished by their painting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".