MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382788369 · doi:10.46748/arteuras.2023.02.002

The history of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the second half of the 16th – first third of the 17th century

2023· article· ru· W4382788369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIskusstvo Evrazii [The Art of Eurasia] · 2023
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconPaintingPeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Landscape paintingState (computer science)Art historyArtHistoryVisual artsArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В исследовании ставится цель обобщить, систематизировать сведения и исследовать развитие иконописи в Костромском крае во второй половине XVI – первой трети XVII века. Вводятся в научный оборот и изучаются данные из немногочисленных дошедших до наших дней источников. В 1982 году Государственный архив Костромской области пострадал от пожара, что привело к утрате многих документов XVI–XVII веков. В основу исследования положены утраченные документы и материалы архива в частичном упоминании В.Г. Брюсовой; Писцовая книга Костромы 1627/28–1629/1630 гг., которая является важным источником по социально-экономическому положению города в первой трети XVII века; сведения из различных дореволюционных изданий, новейшего свода русской иконописи XIII–XIX вв. и других источников. Систематизация приведенных фактов дает представление о формировании и развитии иконописи в Костромском крае в указанный период. Начало становления иконописи в Костроме предварительно отнесено к последней четверти XVI века, в первой трети XVII века работы местных иконописцев уже распространяются по России и Костромскому краю и имеют характерные черты письма. This study aims to generalize, systematize and study the development of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the second half of the 16th – the first third of the 17th century. The author introduces into scientific circulation and systematizes information from a few sources that have come down to our days. In 1982, the State Archive of the Kostroma Region suffered from a fire, so many documents of the 16th–17th centuries were lost. The study is based on lost documents and archive materials in partial mention by V.G. Bryusova; the Scribe Book of Kostroma 1627/28–1629/1630, which is an important source on the social and economic situation of the city in the first third of the 17th century; information from various pre-revolutionary publications, the present corpus of Russian icon painting of the 13th–19th and other sources. The systematization of the given data gives an idea of the formation and development of icon painting in the Kostroma Region in the specified period. The beginning of the formation of icon painting in Kostroma dates back to the last quarter of the 16th century. In the first third of the 17th century, the works of Kostroma icon painters were already spreading throughout Russia and the Kostroma Region and were distinguished by their painting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it