MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382789819 · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2760-9_8

Facilitating the Sustainable Housing Transition

2023· book-chapter· en· W4382789819 on OpenAlexaff
Trivess Moore, Andréanne Doyon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition (genetics)SustainabilityTransition management (governance)Context (archaeology)BusinessPolitical scienceEconomic systemEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this chapter, we reflect on the preceding chapters of the book to discuss implications of the evidence and current context for facilitating the sustainable housing transition. We do this across three core sections. (1) We discuss the importance of drawing upon sustainability transitions theory to inform the sustainable housing transitions. This includes reflections on how we need to extend the theory to align with the unique challenges of the housing sector. (2) We discuss the sustainable housing transition, including where we are placed in that transition, potential pathways forward, and challenges that still need to be addressed. (3) We reflect on the types of innovations that are required across policy, practice, and research to help facilitate the sustainable housing transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSustainable Building Design and AssessmentFrench-language works237,207