Karageorgou-Bastea, Christina. Beyond Intimacy. Radical Proximity and Justice in Three Mexican Poets. Montreal & Kingston / McGill-Queen’s UP, 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El libro de Christina Karageourgou-Bastea (profesora-investigadora de la Universidad de Vanderbilt) presenta una profunda interpretación de tres obras fundamentales para el conocimiento de la sustancia de la palabra poética en México. Se trata de Poesida (1995) de Abigael Bohórquez, Ansina (2015) de Myriam Moscona y Migraciones. Poema 1976-2020 (2020) de Gloria Gervitz. Sin ignorar su contexto histórico, las obras que conforman el estudio de Karageorgou-Bastea se estudian en diálogo con grandes monumentos de la historia literaria, tanto en el ámbito latinoamericano, como en los ámbitos anglófono y europeo en general. Este acercamiento a la poesía mexicana nos otorga un conocimiento mucho más profundo de la esencia de la obra poética como acto enunciativo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".