MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4382866042 · doi:10.1515/9780773569119-002

Preface

2001· book-chapter· en· W4382866042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has always been a women's history in Canada.Women's historians, especially, have been recording it both orally and in writing since storytelling began.First Nations women, teaching and nursing sisters in New France, nineteenth-century British imperialists, and early twentieth-century feminists are only some of many who, individually or collectively, have passed down stories or have documented Canadian women's lives.There were accounts of mythic women, like Aataentsic, or of mortal heroines, like Madeleine de Vercheres, Laura Secord, and Lady Aberdeen, but there were also social histories of and historical novels about ordinary Canadian women.It is surprising, then, that women's history had to be rediscovered in the last three decades of the twentieth century.For those of us involved in that exciting task, there at first seemed little to go on and only gradually did we become aware of the abundance of fascinating work that had preceded our own women's history movement.The reasons for the relative inaccessibility of this early women's history are many.Mid-century "professional" historians defined themselves almost exclusively as university-trained and university-employed men; women historians were for a time almost shut out of the business.History, as defined by those boundary-creating professionals, was about political, military, and diplomatic events, with perhaps a little economic history thrown in.Cultural, labour, local, or domestic matters, of interest to many women and to some men, were seen to be of little or no importance.Such prejudices sadly continue, although fortunately they are shared by fewer and fewer historians, both inside and outside of the academy.A prejudice that academic historians have had a harder time shaking is their bias against writers of popular history.For those who care about women's history, this is a dangerous bias.It was, after all, the problematic line drawn between the professional and the amateur historian that in part accounted for the old sense that women were not really part of the Canadian historical record -or capable of being historians.Popular history (much of which is regional or local history) has never lost its appeal in Canada and women historians never ceased to write, but many academics dismissed both.With that dismissal, it could be argued, also came the dismissal of women's history.This present book demonstrates what a mistake that was.It is thus with great pleasure that I have followed the work of the editors who created this book.The past quarter-century has seen the development of a vibrant literature dealing with the history of Canadian women; there are now many collections of scholarly essays and we also have both English and French textbooks on the subject.Documentary collections exist as well, although they are not as easy to find, even in the university bookstores where most women's history books are sold.What we need more of, however, are well-researched and well-written works of a more popular nature, intended for the general public.This volume addresses that need.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5480.285

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→