MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382877349 · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2023.102351

Roles of Hsp90 in Candida albicans morphogenesis and virulence

2023· review· en· W4382877349 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole Robbins, Leah E. Cowen

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Microbiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsCandida albicansBiologyVirulenceHsp90MorphogenesisCorpus albicansMicrobiologyFungal proteinChaperone (clinical)Signal transductionYeastCell biologyGeneticsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGeneHeat shock protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hsp90 is a conserved molecular chaperone that facilitates the folding and function of hundreds of client proteins, many of which serve as core hubs of signal transduction networks. Hsp90 has a critical role in virulence of the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans, which exists as a natural commensal of the human microbiota and is a leading cause of invasive fungal infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The ability of C. albicans to cause disease is tightly coupled to its capacity to undergo a morphogenetic transition between yeast and filamentous forms. Here, we describe the complex mechanisms by which Hsp90 regulates C. albicans morphogenesis and virulence, and explore the potential of targeting fungal Hsp90 as a therapeutic strategy to combat fungal infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in MicrobiologySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207