MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382890541 · doi:10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27227

Priority-Based Search for the Virtual Network Embedding Problem

2023· article· en· W4382890541 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Zheng, Hang Ma, Sven Koenig, Erik Kline, T. K. Satish Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaSimon Fraser UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEmbeddingComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)HeuristicSolverContext (archaeology)Network virtualizationPath (computing)Theoretical computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsVirtualizationArtificial intelligenceComputer networkCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Virtual Network Embedding (VNE) problem is a constrained optimization problem. It arises in the context of allocating resources on heterogeneous physical networks to provide end-to-end computing services. In this paper, we introduce a new solver, called VNE-PBS, that uses priority-based search (PBS) for solving the VNE problem. VNE-PBS uses a prioritized heuristic search algorithm that explores the space of all possible priority orderings using a systematic depth-first search. The solver is inspired by the success of PBS for the Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem and the similarities between the VNE and MAPF problems. We show that VNE-PBS significantly outperforms competing methods on various benchmark instances for both the offline and online versions of the VNE problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and SchedulingSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207