MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382894915 · doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03131-6

Quantum atmosphere effective radii for different spin fields from quantum gravity inspired black holes

2023· article· en· W4382894915 on OpenAlexafffund
D. M. Gingrich

Bibliographic record

VenueGeneral Relativity and Gravitation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsSchwarzschild radiusBlack hole (networking)RADIUSQuantum gravityQuantumQuantum mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsGravitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quantum atmosphere effective radii for the emission of spin-0, 1/2, 1, and 2 massless fields from Schwarzschild, Tangherlini, non-commutative geometry inspired, and polymeric black holes are calculated. The power observed from the black hole at spatial infinity taking greybody factors into account is compared to an equal-power black-body radiator of the same temperature but different effective radius. A large range of different radii are obtained for different spin fields and black holes. The equal-power black-body effective radius is not, in general, a good proxy for the location of the quantum atmosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneral Relativity and GravitationSame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207