MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382918376 · doi:10.1042/bcj20230081

Inherited disease-linked arginine76/75 mutants in Cx50 and Cx45 showed impaired homotypic and heterotypic gap junction function, but not Cx43

2023· article· en· W4382918376 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianhe Li, Honghong Chen, Xiaole Li, Peter B. Stathopulos, Donglin Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsConnexinGap junctionMutantBiologyGeneticsCell biologyIntracellularConnexonGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connexins form intercellular communication channels, known as gap junctions (GJs), in many tissues/organs. Mutations in connexin genes are found to be linked to various inherited diseases, but the mechanisms are not fully clear. The Arg76 (R76) in Cx50 is fully conserved across the entire connexin family and is a hotspot for five connexin-linked inherited diseases, including Cx50 and Cx46-linked congenital cataract, Cx43-linked oculodentodigital dysplasia, and Cx45-linked cardiac arrhythmias. To better understand the molecular and cellular mechanism of dysfunction caused by R76/75 mutations, we examined the functional status and properties of GJs containing R76 mutations in Cx50 (R76H/C), Cx43 (R76H/S/C), and Cx45 (R75H) with an emphasis on heterotypic GJs in connexin-deficient model cells. All tested mutants showed an impairment of homotypic GJ function reflected by a decreased coupling% and conductance, except for Cx43 R76H/S. These connexin mutants also showed impaired GJ function when paired with a docking-compatible connexin, such as Cx50/Cx46 or Cx45/Cx43, except for all mutants on Cx43 which formed functional heterotypic GJs with Cx45. Localization studies on fluorescent protein tagged connexin mutants revealed that Cx45 R75H and Cx43 R76C showed impaired localization. Our homology structure models indicated that mutations of R76/75 in these GJs led to a loss of intra- and/or inter-connexin non-covalent interactions (salt bridges) at the sidechain of this residue, which could contribute to the observed GJ impairments underlying diseases. It is interesting that unlike those disease-linked variants in Cx50 and Cx45, Cx43 can tolerate some variations at R76.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical JournalSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207