MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382918565 · doi:10.1097/mbc.0000000000001236

Resolution of cardiac surgical bleeding with the combination of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and fresh frozen plasma following lack of response to fresh frozen plasma alone in a patient with severe factor XI deficiency

2023· article· en· W4382918565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Percy Boateng, Mala Varma, Lilyanne Chen, H A Kyaw, Nay Lin Kyaw, Joseph Yoe

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFresh frozen plasmaMedicineFactor XIProthrombin complex concentrateFactor VIIRecombinant factor VIIaFibrinolysisSurgeryFactor VPROTHROMBIN COMPLEXHeparinCoagulationGastroenterologyInternal medicineWarfarinThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Factor XI deficiency is associated with a bleeding tendency in some patients. Factor XI helps to reduce fibrinolysis. Bleeding risk is increased in factor XI-deficient patients during surgeries with high fibrinolytic activity, including nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal and genitourinary surgeries. Treatment options for factor XI-deficient patients include fresh frozen plasma (FFP), antifibrinolytics, recombinant factor VIIa, and factor XI concentrates (available in Australia, Canada, and some European countries). 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC) is an extract of FFP comprised of unactivated factors II, VII, IX, and X, proteins C and S, and heparin. It has been used for cardiac surgical bleeding. We report the first case of a patient with severe factor XI deficiency and cardiac surgical bleeding, which resolved with the combination of 4-factor PCC and FFP after lack of response to FFP alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood Coagulation & FibrinolysisSame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207