MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382919244

The Brain Tumor Segmentation - Metastases (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI.

2024· preprint· en· W4382919244 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed W. Moawad, Anastasia Janas, Ujjwal Baid, Divya Ramakrishnan, Rachit Saluja, Nader A. Fawzy, Nazanin Maleki, Leon Jekel, Nikolay Yordanov, Pascal Fehringer, Athanasios Gkampenis, Raisa Amiruddin, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Anazodo, Sanjay Aneja, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Timothy Bergquist, Veronica Chiang, Verena Chung, Gian Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, J. Mark Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Keyvan Farahani, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhifan Jiang, Elaine Johanson, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Florian Kofler, Kiril Krantchev, Dominic LaBella, Koen Van Leemput, Hongwei Li, Marius George Linguraru, Xinyang Liu, Zeke Meier, Bjoern Menze, Harrison Moy, Klara Osenberg, Marie Piraud, Zachary Reitman, Chunhao Wang, Benedikt Wiestler, Walter F. Wiggins, Umber Shafique, Klara Willms, Arman Avesta, Khaled Bousabarah, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Nicolò Gennaro, Wolfgang Holler, Manpreet Kaur, Pamela LaMontagne, MingDe Lin, Jan Lost, Daniel S. Marcus, R Maresca, Sarah Merkaj, Gabriel Cassinelli Pedersen, Marc von Reppert, Aristeidis Sotiras, Oleg M. Teytelboym, Niklas Tillmans, Malte Westerhoff, Ayda Youssef, Devon Godfrey, Scott Floyd, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Irada Pflüger, Jaeyoung Cho, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Justin Cramer, Gloria J. Guzman Perez-Carillo, Derek R. Johnson, Anthony Kam, Benjamin Y. M. Kwan, Lillian M. Lai, Neil Lall, Fatima Memon, Satya Narayana Patro, Bojan Petrović, Tiffany Y. So, Gerard Thompson, Lei Wu, Elizabeth Schrickel, Anu Bansal, Frederik Barkhof, Cristina Besada, Sammy Chu, Jason Druzgal, Alexandru Dusoi, Luciano Farage, Fabrício Stewan Feltrin, Amy Fong, Steve H. Fung, R. Ian Gray, Ichiro Ikuta, Michael Iv, Alida A. Postma, Amit Mahajan, David Joyner, Chase Krumpelman, Laurent Létourneau‐Guillon, Christie M. Lincoln, Máté E. Maros, Elka Miller, Fanny Morón, Esther A. Nimchinsky, Ö. Özsarlak, Uresh Patel, Saurabh Rohatgi, Atin Saha, Anousheh Sayah, Eric D. Schwartz, Robert Shih, Mark S. Shiroishi, Juan E. Small, Manoj Tanwar, Jewels Valerie, Brent D. Weinberg, Matthew L. White, Robert J. Young, Vahe M. Zohrabian, Aynur Azizova, Melanie Brüßeler, Mohanad Ghonim, Mohamed Ghonim, Abdullah Okar, Luca Pasquini, Yasaman Sharifi, Gagandeep Singh, Nico Sollmann, Theodora Soumala, Mahsa Taherzadeh, Philipp Kickingereder, Martha Foltyn, Ajay Malhotra, Aly Abayazeed, Francesco Dellepiane, Philipp Lohmann, Víctor M. Pérez‐García, Hesham Elhalawani, Sanaria Al-Rubaiey, Rui Duarte Armindo, Kholod Ashraf, Moamen Mostafa, Mohamed Badawy, Jeroen Bisschop, Nima Broomand Lomer, Jan Bukatz, Jim Chen, Petra Cimflová, Felix Corr, Alexis Crawley, Lisa Deptula, Tasneem Elakhdar, Islam Haney Shawali, Shahriar Faghani, Alexandra Frick, Vaibhav Gulati, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Fátima Hierro, Rasmus Holmboe Dahl, Sarah Maria Jacobs, Kuang-chun Jim Hsieh, Sedat Giray Kandemirli, Katharina Kersting, Laura Kida, Sofia Kollia, Ioannis Koukoulithras, Xiao Li, Ahmed Abouelatta, Aya Mansour, Ruxandra-Catrinel Maria-Zamfirescu, Marcela Marsiglia, Yohana Sarahi Mateo-Camacho, Mark J. McArthur, Olivia McDonnell, M McHugh, Mana Moassefi, Samah Mostafa Morsi, Khanak Nandolia, Syed Raza Naqvi, Yalda Nikanpour, Mostafa Alnoury, Abdullah Mohamed Aly Nouh, Francesca Pappafava, Markand D. Patel, S. Petrucci, Eric Rawie, Scott B. Raymond, Borna Roohani, Sadeq Sabouhi, Laura Sánchez‐García, Zoe Shaked, Pokhraj P Suthar, Talissa A. Altes, Edvin Isufi, Jaime Gass, Jonathan Thacker, Abdul Tarabishy, Benjamin Turner, Sebastiano Vacca, George K. Vilanilam, Daniel Warren, David Weiss, Fikadu Worede, Sara Yousry, Wondwossen Lerebo, Alejandro Aristizábal, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, Sarthak Pati, Micah Sheller, Evan Calabrese, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Ayman Nada, Yury Velichko, Spyridon Bakas, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Mariam Aboian

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenWindsor Regional HospitalUniversity of CalgaryArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)McGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalQueen's UniversitySickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSegmentationBrain metastasisLesionRadiologyGliomaGuidelineBrain tumorMetastasisInternal medicineCancerPathologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207