Efficient Numerical Shape Optimization of Natural Convection Cooled Heat Sinks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient natural convection-cooled heat sinks are vital to the future of electronics cooling due to their low energy demand in the absence of an external pumping agency in comparison to other cooling methods. The present study is aimed to identify the most effective fin design for enhancing heat transfer in natural convection applications. Initially, a baseline case with rectangular fins was considered in the present study and it was optimized with respect to fin spacing. This optimized baseline case is then validated against the semi-empirical correlation proposed by Elen-baas (1942) [2]. Upon good agreement, the validated model is used for comparative analysis of different heat sink configurations with rectangular, trapezoidal, curved, and angled fins. The optimised fin spacing obtained for the baseline case is also used for the other heat sink configura-tions and then the fin designs are further optimized for better performance. However, for the an-gled fin case, the optimized configuration proposed by Zhang et al. (2020) [3] is adopted in the present study. This study is carried out with Ansys Fluent for a Rayleigh number of 2.4 × 10^6. The proposed novel curved fin design with a shroud defined as Case C4 showed a 4.1% decrease in the system’s thermal resistance with an increase in the heat transfer coefficient of 4.4% when compared to the optimized baseline fin case. The obtained results are further non-dimensionalized with proposed scaling in terms of the baseline case for the two novel heat sink cases (trapezoidal, curved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".