MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmissibility-based Kalman Filtering For Systems With Non-Gaussian Process Noise

2023· article· en· W4382935808 on OpenAlex
Abdelrahman Khalil, Almuatazbellah Boker, Khaled F. Aljanaideh, Mohammad Al Janaideh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterNoise (video)Gaussian noiseControl theory (sociology)Noise measurementProcess (computing)Computer scienceCovarianceAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of transmissibility operators refers to the mathematical relationships between system outputs. They can be used to estimate the independent output of a system based on sensor measurements only. In this case, the output estimation is independent of the process noise or unmodeled dynamics. This allows for the estimation of process noise regardless of its probability distribution. The proposed approach takes into account the possibility of using the Kalman filter theme in the filtering of output noise regardless of the process noise distribution. The proposed approach does not require the covariance estimation of the process noise. Since the proposed approach considers the ability to formulate unmodeled dynamics or parameter uncertainties as non-Gaussian process noise, it can handle both. The potential of this approach is demonstrated by implementing it in a group of connected autonomous robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it