MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decomposition and distributed predictive control of integrated energy systems

2023· article· en· W4382935937 on OpenAlexaff
Long Wu, Jinfeng Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDecompositionDistributed generationRenewable energyInterconnectionWind powerDistributed computingWork (physics)Distributed data storeEnergy storageControl engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated energy systems (IESs) play an important role in absorbing renewable energy and improving overall fuel efficiency in distributed energy systems. An IES typically consists of a few energy generation and storage units (e.g., solar panels, wind turbines, battery banks, water tanks) that are closely interconnected. Given the distinct dynamics of the different energy generation and storage units, a centralized control scheme in general does not work well. In this work, we show how an IES can be decomposed into smaller subsystems and how distributed economic model predictive control (EMPC) can be designed based on the decomposed subsystems to optimize the operation of the IES. In the decomposition of the IES, we explore both decomposing the entire system vertically based on the time-scale multiplicity exhibited in the IES dynamics and horizontally based on the closeness of the interconnection between the various operating units. The impact of the order of applying the vertical and horizontal decomposition is also discussed. Based on the decomposed subsystems, a distributed EMPC scheme is designed. We illustrate how the features of the decomposed subsystem models can be used in the design of the local EMPCs to reduce the computational complexity and information exchange between the controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207