MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust MPC for Open-Loop Unstable Systems Using A New Data-Based System Representation

2023· article· en· W4382936057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInnovation Fund
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)Model predictive controlComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Data modelingExternal Data RepresentationReduction (mathematics)State (computer science)Loop (graph theory)Open-loop controllerArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringAlgorithmControl (management)Closed loopMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a robust model predictive control (MPC) approach for open-loop unstable systems with initially measured input-state data. Compared with a behavioral approach used in the existing data-driven MPC, a data-based system representation which is better to describe the original system is constructed to replace the classic model to predict future behaviors, leading to the reduction of computational burden and the improvement of the model mismatch between the prediction model and the original plant. Accordingly, the terminal ingredients dependent on this data-based representation are designed. Simulation results are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207