MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382938408 · doi:10.5539/mas.v17n2p1

Coal Image Recognition Method Based on Improved Semantic Segmentation Model of PSPNET Network

2023· article· en· W4382938408 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianqin Gao, Kaihua Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)SegmentationFeature (linguistics)Pyramid (geometry)PoolingImage segmentationFeature extractionComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To implement the intelligence and automation of coal mines, coal recognition plays a crucial role. In order to further improve the accuracy and speed of intelligent coal recognition, this paper proposes a semantic segmentation model based on an improved PSPNET network. (1) The lightweight MobilenetV2 module is used as the backbone feature extraction network. Compared to traditional networks, it has fewer parameters while achieving higher recognition accuracy and speed.(2) The Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) is introduced into the Pyramid Pooling Module (PPM) to enhance the network's ability to extract detailed features and effectively fuse spatial and channel information, thus improving the segmentation accuracy of the model.(3) Data augmentation and image feature enhancement methods are employed to overcome sample distribution differences, enhance model generalization, and adapt to coal-rock recognition tasks in different application scenarios. The proposed approach is tested on a self-made coal segmentation dataset and compared with the unimproved PSPNET, Hernet, U-net, and DeeplabV3+ models in terms of Mean Intersection over Union (Miou), recognition accuracy, edge detail recognition, model size, and parameter count. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to other models, the improved PSPNET network not only has lower computational complexity and parameter count but also exhibits stronger coal detail feature extraction capability, higher segmentation accuracy, and better processing efficiency.Finally, the improved PSPNET model was trained and tested on a coal rock image segmentation dataset with image feature enhancement.The accuracy, MIU and MPA of the improved PSPNET network reached 65.04, 73.15 and 74.27 respectively.It can be seen that the improved network has superior feature extraction ability and computational efficiency to achieve coal surface image recognition. This verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method in the actual coal rock image recognition task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207