MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4382982862 · doi:10.3390/en16135085

Monitoring Technologies for HVDC Transmission Lines

2023· article· en· W4382982862 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeff Laninga, Ali Nasr Esfahani, Gevindu Ediriweera, Nathan D. Jacob, Behzad Kordi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Hydro
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsElectric power transmissionHVACTransmission (telecommunications)Power transmissionElectrical engineeringEngineeringTransmission systemComputer scienceElectric power systemTelecommunicationsPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringAir conditioning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HVDC transmission systems are becoming more prevalent because of the advantages they offer. They are more efficient and environmentally friendly and are becoming preferred in distributed power generation. The reliable operation of HVDC transmission lines requires distributed, online monitoring, which is not as well-developed as those in an HVAC system. The advancement of HVDC systems will require online monitoring that provides information on the operating and environmental conditions, mechanical stress on the conductors and the structure, vegetation clearance, and security of the system. This perspective paper provides a thorough overview of the state-of-the-art technologies that are applicable to the monitoring of HVDC transmission lines. The challenges and future direction in the development of sensors for HVDC applications are highlighted. One of the key challenges unique to HVDC transmission lines is energy harvesting from the transmission line conductors to provide power for the monitoring equipment. This paper reviews the potential technologies for energy harvesting from HVAC transmission lines and their suitability for employment in HVDC transmission lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207