Audit of the effectiveness of the organic farming development in European countries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the results of the audit of the development of organic production in the EU countries using the example of Poland. It is noted that today Poland is significantly behind the average level in the European Union, where the share of organic land is 8.1%. It has been proven that in order to reach the level of other EU countries by the end of 2030, the average annual rate of growth of organic and transitional lands should be at least +11.2%, and the share of transitional lands in them should be 25.1%. It is noted that the strategic goal of the EU by 2030 is to convert a quarter of all agricultural land into organic. In this case, the average annual rate of growth of the corresponding areas in Poland should be +22.8%, and the share of transitional lands in them should be at least 40.6%. It is calculated that, given the relatively low level of productivity, Poland can achieve this level only through state support and the creation of additional financial incentives
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it