PHRkNN: Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Reverse kNN Query Over High-Dimensional Data in Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Big data and bursting cloud computing technologies have facilitated an increasing trend of outsourcing data-driven services to the cloud, where the reverse kNN (RkNN) query is a popularly outsourced query service. The RkNN query aims to retrieve objects having the query object as kNN and widely applied in the product recommendation. Considering privacy concerns, the outsourced query services are demanded to protect data privacy, and consequently a series of privacy-preserving query solutions have been put forth. Nevertheless, RkNN query over high-dimensional data has not been studied to date. In this work, we design the first efficient and privacy-preserving RkNN query scheme over encrypted high-dimensional data, named PHRkNN. Specifically, we first introduce a pivot filter condition for the RkNN query and utilize it to deliberately design a pivot filter R-tree (PFR-tree) to organize the high-dimensional dataset such that the RkNN query has sublinear query efficiency. Then, we propose our PHRkNN scheme by designing some homomorphic encryption based private algorithms and applying them to privately achieve PFR-tree based RkNN query. After that, we propose an oblivious PHRkNN scheme on the basis of the PHRkNN scheme by designing a private random tree permutation (PRTP) algorithm to protect the access pattern privacy. The security of our PHRkNN scheme and oblivious PHRkNN scheme is proved by the simulation-based security analysis. The performance is verified through computational costs and communication overheads evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".