MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383031959 · doi:10.15366/ldc2013.5.7.001

[por] DIMENSÃO POLÍTICA E DE PODER DA COMIDA RÉGIA E DO CORPO DO REI

2014· article· pt· W4383031959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrosdelacorte es · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory of Colonial Brazil
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO Comer é uma necessidade natural e fisiológica de todos os homens, em todos os tempos. Mas é também uma prática cultural complexa, que convoca não só a história e a cultura material, mas também a antropologia, a sociologia, a etnologia, a psicologia, a história de arte e a história das ideias. Numa sociedade tão frágil como a dos nossos antepassados, o acto de comer era um “lugar” fundamental de diferenciação e de distinção sociais e significado político. Na verdade, a mesa do rei constituiu um instrumento político para a monarquia, desde as formas relativamente simples da Idade Média até à sua cada vez maior complexidade na Época Moderna.[...] PALAVRAS CHAVRE: alimentação régia, medicina galénica, dimensão política, poder, corte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it