Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter highlights the <italic>Actes du très dévot Frère Didace Pelletier</italic>, a hagiographic text that was assembled in support of the canonization of Recollect Brother Didace Pelletier in 1719 by his confrère. It highlights twenty-one of <italic>Actes</italic>'s stories that are accounts of healing attributed to Frère Didace's intervention, which were recorded in official procès-verbaux undertaken between 1699 and 1717 and attested to by written certification. It also explains why the twenty-one stories of miraculous intercession lean so heavily on the impaired body. The chapter reviews how the <italic>Actes</italic> preserves the testimony of lay men and women, supplementing narratives with perspectives on sickness and disability anchored in the experiences of ordinary French Catholics in early modern Canada. It argues that the miracle stories are concerned with making God real and only incidentally with embodied difference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it