Editorial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Com a Igreja e como Igreja, estamos em caminho sinodal.Convocado pelo papa Francisco em 2021, o sínodo do povo de Deus, em curso até 2024, tem se revelado uma oportunidade singular de comunhão eclesial.Além das etapas estabelecidas pela metodologia própria, construída em uma perspectiva indutivadas igrejas locais para a Igreja universalo itinerário sinodal também está presente na agenda da academia, que fornece reflexões para que a temática avance em perspectiva teológica e amadureça também enquanto realidade pastoral.Sob diferentes enfoques e propósitos, portanto, o convite à sinodalidade tem mobilizado reflexões e estudos da comunidade acadêmica, contribuindo, assim, para que o sínodo 2021-2024 não se reduza a um evento pontual, em três etapas, mas seja um percurso de revisita e aprofundamento das dimensões constitutivas da fé.Nessa perspectiva, se situa esta edição da revista Caminhos de Diálogo, particularmente a partir dos trabalhos que integram seu dossiê.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.113 | 0.081 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".