MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383068959 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202204370

Beyond Protocols: Understanding the Electrical Behavior of Perovskite Solar Cells by Impedance Spectroscopy

2023· article· en· W4383068959 on OpenAlexafffund
Elnaz Ghahremanirad, Osbel Almora, Sunil Suresh, Amandine A. Drew, Towhid H. Chowdhury, Alexander R. Uhl

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)Electrical impedanceHysteresisOptoelectronicsMetastabilitySpectroscopyCharacterization (materials science)NanotechnologyPerovskite solar cellEngineering physicsSolar cellElectrodeElectrical engineeringCondensed matter physicsChemistryElectrochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Impedance spectroscopy (IS) is an effective characterization technique used to probe and distinguish charge dynamics occurring at different timescales in optoelectronic and electric devices. With the rapid rise of research being conducted on perovskite solar cells (PSCs), IS has significantly contributed to the understanding of their device performance and degradation mechanisms, including metastable effects such as current–voltage hysteresis. The ionic–electronic behavior of PSCs and the presence of a wide variety of perovskite compositions and cell architectures add complexity to the accurate interpretation of the physical processes occurring in these devices. In this review, the most common IS protocols are explained to help perform accurate impedance measurements on PSC devices. It critically reviews the most commonly used equivalent circuits alongside drift‐diffusion modeling as a complementary technique to analyze the impedance response of PSCs. As an emerging method for characterizing the interfacial recombination between the perovskite layer and selective contacts, light intensity modulated impedance spectroscopy technique is further discussed. Lastly, important works on the application of IS measurement protocols for PSCs are summarized followed by a detailed discussion, providing a critical perspective and outlook on the growing topic of IS on PSCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations130
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207