Two-stage (liquid-solid) anaerobic mono-digestion of ammonia-rich chicken manure at low-temperature: Operational strategy and techno-economic assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated mono-digestion of ammonia-rich chicken manure (CM) in a high-solids anaerobic-digester (HSAD) at low-temperature (20±1°C) adopting the recirculation-percolation mode of operation using liquid-inoculum. HSAD was operated for about 282 days in batch-runs under different organic loading rates (4.3-8.7 gVS/L.d), total solids (65-70%) and total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) (23.3- 32.8 g/L) concentrations. It was noted that acclimation of the liquid inoculum to a high concentration of TKN (6.9 g/L) facilitated CM digestion, thereby reducing the start-up phase. The maximum cumulative biogas production rate and specific methane yield were found to be 20 L/d and 0.80±0.12 LCH4g/VSfed, respectively with a methane content over 60% without any signs of inhibition. Operating HSAD at low temperature prevented the accumulation of free-ammonia, which is toxic to methanogens. A techno-economic analysis was also conducted as part of this study to determine the profitability of the system and a 9-year tentative payback period was estimated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".