Real-Time Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotics Utilizing Local and Remote Computers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time learning is crucial for robotic agents adapting to ever-changing, non-stationary environments. A common setup for a robotic agent is to have two different computers simultaneously: a resource-limited local computer tethered to the robot and a powerful remote computer connected wirelessly. Given such a setup, it is unclear to what extent the performance of a learning system can be affected by resource limitations and how to efficiently use the wirelessly connected powerful computer to compensate for any performance loss. In this paper, we implement a real-time learning system called the Remote-Local Distributed (ReLoD) system to distribute computations of two deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), between a local and a remote computer. The performance of the system is evaluated on two vision-based control tasks developed using a robotic arm and a mobile robot. Our results show that SAC's performance degrades heavily on a resource-limited local computer. Strikingly, when all computations of the learning system are deployed on a remote workstation, SAC fails to compensate for the performance loss, indicating that, without careful consideration, using a powerful remote computer may not result in performance improvement. However, a carefully chosen distribution of computations of SAC consistently and substantially improves its performance on both tasks. On the other hand, the performance of PPO remains largely unaffected by the distribution of computations. In addition, when all computations happen solely on a powerful tethered computer, the performance of our system remains on par with an existing system that is well-tuned for using a single machine. ReLoD is the only publicly available system for real-time RL that applies to multiple robots for vision-based tasks. The source code can be found at https://github.com/rlai-lab/relod
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".