MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dynamic Modeling and Identification of a Robotic Intracardiac Echo Catheter

2023· article· en· W4383097632 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Salehizadeh, Filipe Pedrosa, H. Bassan, Rajni V. Patel, Jagadeesan Jayender

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCatheterCatheter ablationIntracardiac injectionAblationBiomedical engineeringPulsatile flowComputer scienceMedicineRadiologySurgeryCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catheter-based cardiac ablation is the preferred method of treating atrial fibrillation. Conventionally, the catheter is navigated in the heart using X-ray fluoroscopy imaging and an electroanatomical map. Although successful, these imaging modalities do not provide real-time feedback on the quality of lesions created, which in turn could lead to recurrence of arrhythmia. Intracardiac echo (ICE) catheter provides real-time imaging within the heart to visualize both the ablation catheter and lesions created. However, manipulating the ablation and ICE catheters simultaneously is tedious and time consuming. As a first step towards developing a robotic ICE catheter that can autonomously follow the ablation catheter and monitor the lesions, we have developed a dynamic model for the ICE catheter. The model is based on the Cosserat theory for flexible rods that relies on strain parametrization. The model also accounts for frictional forces between the catheter sheath and tendons, external loads and fluid forces acting on the catheter. A good nominal model for describing the catheter dynamics is essential to develop a robust control scheme for the robotic ICE catheter. The parameters of the ICE catheter are estimated using weight release, tendon-driven actuation and fluid flow experiments. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dynamic model for the ICE catheter that accurately reflects the dynamics of the catheter under pulsatile fluid flow within a heart phantom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→