Biometric and RFID Passive Tag based Student Identification System for Secure Attendance Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a biometric and RFID passive tag-based student identification system for secure attendance management. The system utilizes the unique biometric features of each student, such as fingerprint, along with an RFID tag embedded in the student ID card to authenticate and track student attendance. The system is designed to overcome the limitations of traditional attendance management systems, such as manual entry errors, proxy attendance, and low accuracy. The proposed system provides an automated and secure attendance management solution that ensures accurate attendance recording and eliminates the possibility of fraudulent activities. A daily brief message service (SMS) delivered by a GSM (Global System for Mobile) module, notifying the guardian as to whether the individual has arrived at the institution. There will be a web application where students and instructors will view a student's current attendance and location on campus. The system has been implemented and tested in a real-world educational setting, and the results demonstrate its efficiency and reliability in managing student attendance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it