MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cellulose biosaccharification by Irpex lacteus wood decay fungus

2023· article· es· W4383109846 on OpenAlexfundno aff
С. М. Бойко, Maksym Netsvetov, Vladimir G. Radchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueMaderas Ciencia y tecnología · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineSimon Fraser University
KeywordsCellulaseCarboxymethyl celluloseCelluloseChemistryHydrolysisFood scienceSubstrate (aquarium)Enzymatic hydrolysisFilter paperBiomass (ecology)SodiumNuclear chemistryBiochemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enzymatic hydrolysis is an environmentally friendly technology to produce sugars from pretreated biomass.Here, we show that the new Il-11 Irpex lacteus strain can synthesize cellulases in a high quantity.The peptone and filter paper contained in the medium significantly enhanced activity of endo-1,4-β-D-glucanases (app.50 IU/mL) and total cellulases (app.9 IU/mL), whereas the medium with peptone and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose stimulated activity of exo-1,4-β-D-glucanases (33 IU/mL).The expression of cellulases reached its maximum within 96-144 hours, and the optimum pH is 3,7.Thermal treatment at 30 °C for 60 minutes activated endo-1,4-β-D-glucanases and total cellulases, while exo-1,4-β-D-glucanases activity was enhanced following 40 °C treatment.In total, the cellulases complex (300 IU/g) saccharified untreated cellulose by 38 % in 48 hours.Concentrate with filter paper activity 100 IU/g is the more balanced enzyme-substrate ratio (2 %), which allows prolonging the saccharification process that will have a positive effect on the cost of the final product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaderas Ciencia y tecnologíaSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207