A Novel Mechanism for Misbehavior Detection in Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) have provided new technologies to protect human life, speed up assistance, and improve traffic, to aid drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANET) are the fundamental elements in an ITS ecosystem. However, its characteristics make the system susceptible to numerous attacks, such as Denial of Service (DoS). In this paper, we proposed a security system based on intrusion detection called Detection of Anomalous Behaviour in Smart Conveyance Operations (DAMASCO). We used a statistical approach to detect anomalies in vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V). The anomaly detection module addresses the Medium Access Control (MAC) sublayer to assess the number of packages sent to identify potentially malicious nodes, block their activity, and maintain a reputation list. The algorithm calculates the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) to identify outliers and characteristics of DoS. Our experiments were performed in a simulated environment using a realistic urban mobility model. The results demonstrate that the proposed security system achieved a 3% false positive rate and no false negatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".