MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recovery and Redemption in the Histoire de l’Hôtel Dieu de Quebec

2022· book-chapter· en· W4383115054 on OpenAlex
Mary Dunn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePrinceton University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIndigenousEthnologyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter cites <italic>Histoire de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Quebec</italic>, which was written by Mère Jeanne-Françoise Juchereau de la Ferté. It points out how <italic>Histoire</italic> traces the institutional history of the Hôtel-Dieu in Quebec from its establishment in 1636 to 1716. The ambition of the <italic>Histoire</italic> was not to advertise the gains of the Canadian mission but rather to teach generations of nursing sisters what it meant to be a Hospitaller nun attached to the Hôtel-Dieu in Quebec. The chapter explores the Indigenous neglect of the sick and infirm, which was baffling and an appalling custom that left no room to doubt just how sorely the people of the eastern woodlands needed the moral influence of Christianity. It tells the stories of the sickness that figured the nursing sisters of Quebec's Hôtel-Dieu as missionaries whose vocation was to save the souls of others and to sanctify themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it