Au tribunal de Ṭalīt. Deux partages successoraux entre Coptes du Fayoum (ve/xie siècle)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le tribunal de Ṭalīt, dans le Fayoum méridional, n’était jusqu’ici connu qu’à partir d’un unique document remontant au début de la période fatimide. La présente contribution offre l’édition et la traduction de deux nouveaux documents, comportant en tout cinq textes qui permettent de mettre en évidence le fonctionnement de ce petit tribunal provincial présidé par un substitut, ainsi que son articulation aux échelons supérieurs et inférieurs du système judiciaire islamique. Le procès-verbal d’une audience (maḥḍar), une pétition de plaideur (qiṣṣa) et le rescrit (tawqīʿ) auquel celle‑ci donna lieu, projettent une lumière nouvelle sur les usages de l’écrit dans les tribunaux, surtout étudiés jusqu’ici à partir des sources littéraires. Enfin, à travers ces documents, transparaissent les stratégies successorales d’une famille de notables coptes du village de Ṭuṭūn/Tebtynis, les Banū Ǧirǧa, qui recoururent au tribunal islamique pour sanctionner des accords à l’amiable conformes à leurs coutumes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".