Homotopy Theories of (∞, ∞)-Categories as Universal Fixed Points With Respect to Weak Enrichment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We show that both the $\infty $-category of $(\infty , \infty )$-categories with inductively defined equivalences, and with coinductively defined equivalences, satisfy universal properties with respect to weak enrichment in the sense of Gepner and Haugseng. In particular, we prove that $(\infty , \infty )$-categories with coinductive equivalences form a terminal object in the $\infty $-category of fixed points for enrichment, and that $(\infty , \infty )$-categories with inductive equivalences form an initial object in the subcategory of locally presentable fixed points. To do so, we develop an analogue of Adámek’s construction of free endofunctor algebras in the $\infty $-categorical setting. We prove that $(\infty , \infty )$-categories with coinductive equivalences form a terminal coalgebra with respect to weak enrichment, and $(\infty , \infty )$-categories with inductive equivalences form an initial algebra with respect to weak enrichment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".