MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4383176085 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8107729

Creating a DH workflow in the SSH Open Marketplace

2023· paratext· en· W4383176085 on OpenAlexaff
Laure Barbot, Elena Battaner Moro, Stefan Buddenbohm, Cesare Concordia, Maja Dolinar, Matej Ďurčo, Cristina Grisot, Klaus Illmayer, Martin Kirnbauer, Mari Kleemola, Alexander König, Michael Kurzmeier, Barbara McGillivray, Clara Parente Boavida, Christian Schuster, Irena Vipavc Brvar, Magdalena Wnuk

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowComputer scienceOpen sourceOperating systemWorld Wide WebDatabaseSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This workshop aims at supporting researchers interested in creating a workflow in the SSH Open Marketplace, to share best practices methods with the community. Selected participants will be supported by the members of the Editorial Board of this discovery portal to write and document their research scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.016
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207