MEDIPIPE: an automated and comprehensive pipeline for cfMeDIP-seq data quality control and analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) has emerged as a promising liquid biopsy technology to detect cancers and monitor treatments. While several bioinformatics tools for DNA methylation analysis have been adapted for cfMeDIP-seq data, an end-to-end pipeline and quality control framework specifically for this data type is still lacking. Here, we present the MEDIPIPE, which provides a one-stop solution for cfMeDIP-seq data quality control, methylation quantification, and sample aggregation. The major advantages of MEDIPIPE are: (i) ease of implementation and reproducibility with Snakemake containerized execution environments that will be automatically deployed via Conda; (ii) flexibility to handle different experimental settings with a single configuration file; and (iii) computationally efficiency for large-scale cfMeDIP-seq profiling data analysis and aggregation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This pipeline is an open-source software under the MIT license and it is freely available at https://github.com/pughlab/MEDIPIPE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".